Posted on

Got Divinity?

People are often shocked when they go to the early Christians hoping to find a solution to problems that have preoccupied Christians since the Reformation. They often find the Fathers relatively unconcerned. A case in point is the debate about what it means to be “saved,” and correspondingly what it means to be justified and sanctified. The post-Reformation tendency, especially among Protestants, is to section these terms off and consider them as discrete events, points on a timeline. The Fathers, however, preferred to speak of salvation as an irreducibly integrated process, which they called “divinization” — or “deification,” or “theosis.”

Those are daring terms, but they are biblical in essence, as is the idea that we share in divinity by our incorporation into Christ. The Apostle Peter said, after all, that Christians are “partakers of the divine nature.”

Whenever people asked me about this doctrine of the Fathers, I usually pointed them to two excellent modern explanations: Scott Hahn’s book First Comes Love and chapter 2 of Cardinal Christoph Schonborn’s book From Death to Life. These are excellent resources — thorough and winsome — but I always wished for something that was handier for evangelism, along the lines of those tracts I often find at the laundromat or supermarket (“Are YOU Saved?”). After all, why should the whole truth — why should our divinization — prove resistant to modern media?

Yesterday I discovered just such a handy booklet: Theosis: Partaking of the Divine Nature, by Mark Shuttleworth, an Orthodox layman. The 20-page booklet is, like the teachings of the Fathers themselves, saturated with the testimony of the Good Book.

“I said, ‘You are gods, and all of you are children of the Most High’ (Ps 82:6)… What on earth does it mean — “you are gods”? Doesn’t our faith teach that there is only one God, in three Persons? How can human beings be gods? … Theosis is the understanding that human beings can have real union with God, and so become like God to such a degree that we participate in the divine nature.”

Shuttleworth gives several pages over to New Testament quotations explaining the meaning and implications of our deification. He then summons the early Fathers to the witness stand: Origen, Athanasius, Basil, Cyril of Alexandria and others. C.S. Lewis even makes a cameo appearance.

This is a very useful little book, great to buy in bulk and stack in the back of the church. And it’s an invaluable tool for modern apologists.

The very first question I received when I launched this blog was from a group of tenacious Catholics living in the Mormon heartland of Utah. My correspondent said that Mormons were increasingly trying to invoke the Fathers’ doctrine of theosis as a sort of anticipation of the Mormon belief that the faithful will be made gods to rule over their own planets in the afterlife. These Utah Catholics, though, diligently applied themselves to studying and discussing the patristic doctrine, and formulating a deeply Christian, patristic response to their nearby neighbors.

The author of Theosis, Mark Shuttleworth, has put this ancient doctrine to the biblical test; he has put it into words that engage the mind; but, a man of extraordinary talent, he has also done something more with the doctrine. He has put it to beautiful music. Shuttleworth has translated these biblical and patristic notions into music in the contemporary praise idiom. His CD travels with me wherever I go. I especially love his setting for the ancient Trisagion and his own composition “My Lord, I Love You.” The disk is not yet available on the Web, but you can buy it directly from the artist. Just send a check for $15 ($12 for the CD; $3 for shipping and handling) to Mark Shuttleworth, 2962 Voelkel Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15216.

Then settle in for some truly divinizing listening.

11 thoughts on “Got Divinity?

  1. BTW, I don’t know about my readers, but I don’t live in Utah. I live in the overwhelmingly Catholic town of Omaha, Nebraska.

  2. My apologies, Brad. I didn’t mean to dislocate you or any part of you. In Omaha you can listen to me on the radio!

  3. I’m the Utah Catholic. Thanks for the info, Mike. I’m still working my way through Cardinal Schonborn’s book, and I look forward to the Shuttleworth booklet.

    I hope some of my wonderful neighbors find their way to your website.

  4. I knew there was one in there somewhere!

  5. Mike,

    What is your understanding of theosis? I believe that St. Thomas in the Summa Theologica explains that in the beatified state, the blessed soul will see God as He is. The blessed will comprehend all external effects of God, but will not fully comprehend the internal life of God and will obviously not be capable of contemplating and understanding God as he contemplates himself. Is this your understanding?

  6. That seems to be what we get from the Fathers, though they don’t employ the same terms. Maximus the Confessor: “The one deified through grace receives for himself everything that God possesses, apart from the identity of substance.” John of Damascus: “through participation in God, man becomes by grace what Christ is by nature.” Athanasius’s classic formula is that God became man so that men might become God. Cardinal Schonborn sums it up: “we become gods and sons through designation and not through nature, through grace and not through nature.” I don’t claim to be a theologian, but I think Thomas and the Fathers provide complementary explanations of the same reality. A theologian at Yale, A.N. Williams wrote a fine book on the subject, The Ground of Union: Deification in Aquinas and Palamas.

  7. I think it is important to point out two important issues when discussing the CF’s and deification: first, diversity existed among the Fathers as to exactly what deification meant; and second, the doctrine developed over the centuries, and is still developing.

    Keeping these two important issues in mind, I believe we must go back to what the Fathers themselves said, and to read them in their original context while combating the temptation to bring much later theological developments into their thought.

    David

  8. Yes, and the Williams book proceeds according to those principles. Give it a read.

  9. I have read Williams book, but IMHO she attempts to reconcile certain aspects of Aquinas’ and Palamas’ theology that cannot be done so. I think a better read is David Bradshaw’s Aristotle East and West – Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom. Another excellent book is Norman Russell’s The Doctrine of Deification In the Greek Patristic Tradition. Hope you (and others) can find the time to read these works.

    David

  10. Thanks a million! I’ll make time.

  11. […] Got Divinity? by Mike Aquilina a Catholic blogger with interests in early Christian studies […]

Comments are closed.