<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Culture Exposed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/05/12/a-culture-exposed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/05/12/a-culture-exposed/</link>
	<description>Mike Aquilina's Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Only Siths Deal in Absolutes&#8221; &#171; Christ Is In Our Midst!</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/05/12/a-culture-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-322824</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Only Siths Deal in Absolutes&#8221; &#171; Christ Is In Our Midst!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/05/12/a-culture-exposed/#comment-322824</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;In pagan Rome, a child did not achieve personhood until recognized by the head of the family, the father. When the mother had given birth, a midwife placed the child on the floor and summoned the father. He examined the child with his criteria of selection in mind. Was the child his? If the man suspected his wife of adultery — ancient Rome’s favorite pastime — he might reject the child without so much as a glance. If the child were an “odious daughter” (a common Roman phrase for female offspring), he would likely turn on his heel and leave the room. If the child were “defective” in any way, he would do the same. As the philosopher Seneca said: “What is good must be set apart from what is good-for-nothing.” Life or death? It all depended upon the will of a man. Human life began when the child was accepted into society. A man did not “have a child.” He “took a child.” The father “raised up” the child by picking it up from the floor. Those non-persons who were left on the floor — while their mothers watched from a birthing chair — would be drowned immediately, or exposed to scavenging animals at the town dump. Against these customs, the Church consistently taught that life begins at conception and should continue till natural death. In such matters, Christianity contradicted pagan mores on almost every point. What were virtuous acts to the Romans and Greeks — contraception, abortion, infanticide, suicide, euthanasia — were abominations to the Christians&#8221;. The Church Fathers have written extensively and the Church has witnessed throughout her history to the sanctity of all life. In another place on The Way of the Fathers it says: &#8220;In the Church’s infancy, the age of the Fathers, abortion and infanticide were commonplace events, requiring little deliberation. Archeology has yielded us a rare glimpse at the inner life of ordinary people in this time. We have a letter from a pagan businessman in which he wrote home to his pregnant wife, amid the usual endearments: “If you are delivered of a child [before I come home], if it is a boy, keep it, if a girl discard it.” Indeed, most pagan cultures considered it a duty to place “defective” newborns on the dunghills at the edge of town, where birds of prey could pick them apart. Most families interpreted the word “defective” broadly, to include female children as well as those with disabilities or disfigurement. Plato and Aristotle commended the practice, and the Roman historian Tacitus said it was “sinister and revolting” for Jews to forbid infanticide. Yet these practices created a crisis for pagans. Abortion and infanticide led to low fertility rates, high maternal mortality, a shortage of marriageable women, and an absence of familial care for the elderly. Over generations, the dwindling native population of Rome grew increasingly dependent on foreign mercenaries to fill the ranks of the army, and immigrants to do the servile jobs that no Roman citizen wanted to do. That makes for an unstable infrastructure. Various emperors tried to legislate fertility, but the law isn’t much of an aphrodisiac. And abortion kills a couple’s love every bit as much as it kills their baby. Besides, people had grown accustomed to an unmoored, leisurely life, drifting from pleasure to pleasure, without the encumbrance of children. We face a similar crisis today. Christianity’s critics say they want to promote a tolerant, welcoming, inclusive society. What they usually mean is a society that gives free rein to every vice, every cruel lust, and every sin. But a growing number of people are dissatisfied with the societal consequences of those sins. What’s a culture to do?.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;In pagan Rome, a child did not achieve personhood until recognized by the head of the family, the father. When the mother had given birth, a midwife placed the child on the floor and summoned the father. He examined the child with his criteria of selection in mind. Was the child his? If the man suspected his wife of adultery — ancient Rome’s favorite pastime — he might reject the child without so much as a glance. If the child were an “odious daughter” (a common Roman phrase for female offspring), he would likely turn on his heel and leave the room. If the child were “defective” in any way, he would do the same. As the philosopher Seneca said: “What is good must be set apart from what is good-for-nothing.” Life or death? It all depended upon the will of a man. Human life began when the child was accepted into society. A man did not “have a child.” He “took a child.” The father “raised up” the child by picking it up from the floor. Those non-persons who were left on the floor — while their mothers watched from a birthing chair — would be drowned immediately, or exposed to scavenging animals at the town dump. Against these customs, the Church consistently taught that life begins at conception and should continue till natural death. In such matters, Christianity contradicted pagan mores on almost every point. What were virtuous acts to the Romans and Greeks — contraception, abortion, infanticide, suicide, euthanasia — were abominations to the Christians&#8221;. The Church Fathers have written extensively and the Church has witnessed throughout her history to the sanctity of all life. In another place on The Way of the Fathers it says: &#8220;In the Church’s infancy, the age of the Fathers, abortion and infanticide were commonplace events, requiring little deliberation. Archeology has yielded us a rare glimpse at the inner life of ordinary people in this time. We have a letter from a pagan businessman in which he wrote home to his pregnant wife, amid the usual endearments: “If you are delivered of a child [before I come home], if it is a boy, keep it, if a girl discard it.” Indeed, most pagan cultures considered it a duty to place “defective” newborns on the dunghills at the edge of town, where birds of prey could pick them apart. Most families interpreted the word “defective” broadly, to include female children as well as those with disabilities or disfigurement. Plato and Aristotle commended the practice, and the Roman historian Tacitus said it was “sinister and revolting” for Jews to forbid infanticide. Yet these practices created a crisis for pagans. Abortion and infanticide led to low fertility rates, high maternal mortality, a shortage of marriageable women, and an absence of familial care for the elderly. Over generations, the dwindling native population of Rome grew increasingly dependent on foreign mercenaries to fill the ranks of the army, and immigrants to do the servile jobs that no Roman citizen wanted to do. That makes for an unstable infrastructure. Various emperors tried to legislate fertility, but the law isn’t much of an aphrodisiac. And abortion kills a couple’s love every bit as much as it kills their baby. Besides, people had grown accustomed to an unmoored, leisurely life, drifting from pleasure to pleasure, without the encumbrance of children. We face a similar crisis today. Christianity’s critics say they want to promote a tolerant, welcoming, inclusive society. What they usually mean is a society that gives free rein to every vice, every cruel lust, and every sin. But a growing number of people are dissatisfied with the societal consequences of those sins. What’s a culture to do?.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xavier</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/05/12/a-culture-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 00:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/05/12/a-culture-exposed/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Mike:
I&#039;m currently reading Cesar Vidal&#039;s El legado del cristanismo en la cultura occidental. He devotes an entire section in the first part called Christinity conquers the empire. the 2 principal subsection is on the women and defense of life. Cesar cites an astounding letter by a Hilario to his wife. She&#039;s pregnant and states rather casually fater telling her how much he misses her and loves her that if the kid&#039;s a girl to get rid of it.
Cesar also points out that Aristotle (whom I have lots of respect for) stated that any woman ove rthe age of 40 who was pregant hadto undergo an abortion in order to keep the polis a &#039;managable size&#039;
Finally, Cesar indirectly talks about the mines but doesn&#039;t go into much detail- just how mortal was it to work in the mines?

Cesar arrives at pretty much the same conclusions as you. He even states that the birth rate was negative and the pagans&#039; behaviour exposed a deep nilism that simply couldn&#039;t sustain itself. I suspect that had the Romans adopted a culture of life as the Christians, we&#039;d still be speaking in an evolved Latin, the Empire would still be around and the Germanic, Arabic and Slavic tribes would&#039;ve been contained for a few centuries more 

xavier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:<br />
I&#8217;m currently reading Cesar Vidal&#8217;s El legado del cristanismo en la cultura occidental. He devotes an entire section in the first part called Christinity conquers the empire. the 2 principal subsection is on the women and defense of life. Cesar cites an astounding letter by a Hilario to his wife. She&#8217;s pregnant and states rather casually fater telling her how much he misses her and loves her that if the kid&#8217;s a girl to get rid of it.<br />
Cesar also points out that Aristotle (whom I have lots of respect for) stated that any woman ove rthe age of 40 who was pregant hadto undergo an abortion in order to keep the polis a &#8216;managable size&#8217;<br />
Finally, Cesar indirectly talks about the mines but doesn&#8217;t go into much detail- just how mortal was it to work in the mines?</p>
<p>Cesar arrives at pretty much the same conclusions as you. He even states that the birth rate was negative and the pagans&#8217; behaviour exposed a deep nilism that simply couldn&#8217;t sustain itself. I suspect that had the Romans adopted a culture of life as the Christians, we&#8217;d still be speaking in an evolved Latin, the Empire would still be around and the Germanic, Arabic and Slavic tribes would&#8217;ve been contained for a few centuries more </p>
<p>xavier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

