<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Listen to R.L. Wilken, Free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/08/29/listen-to-rl-wilken-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/08/29/listen-to-rl-wilken-free/</link>
	<description>Mike Aquilina&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/08/29/listen-to-rl-wilken-free/comment-page-1/#comment-2610</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/08/29/listen-to-rl-wilken-free/#comment-2610</guid>
		<description>That was an interesting little talk. Thanks for pointing to it!

The weird thing about patristics, though, is that it keeps telling me stuff which is totally new and different -- and which I then realize I already kinda knew. Patristics is like going to listen to a great professor, and finding out that it&#039;s all a very learned annotation and explication of my mom&#039;s lectures from when I was eight.  So I was just reading about explicit vs. implicit faith in that Mary in the Fathers book I found -- and boy, did it make sense to me after reading the Fathers.

(It&#039;s also really interesting, though disconcerting, to study anything and actually agree with just about everything the author says. I&#039;m so used to fighting the wrong bits of what I&#039;m being taught. But with the Fathers, I very seldom have to do anything but just take it in and learn. It really is like being back in elementary school, for that.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was an interesting little talk. Thanks for pointing to it!</p>
<p>The weird thing about patristics, though, is that it keeps telling me stuff which is totally new and different &#8212; and which I then realize I already kinda knew. Patristics is like going to listen to a great professor, and finding out that it&#8217;s all a very learned annotation and explication of my mom&#8217;s lectures from when I was eight.  So I was just reading about explicit vs. implicit faith in that Mary in the Fathers book I found &#8212; and boy, did it make sense to me after reading the Fathers.</p>
<p>(It&#8217;s also really interesting, though disconcerting, to study anything and actually agree with just about everything the author says. I&#8217;m so used to fighting the wrong bits of what I&#8217;m being taught. But with the Fathers, I very seldom have to do anything but just take it in and learn. It really is like being back in elementary school, for that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
