Comments on: Should Auld Liturgics Be Forgot? http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/09/06/should-auld-liturgics-be-forgot/ Mike Aquilina's Blog Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:36:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: St. Jimbob of the Apokalypse http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/09/06/should-auld-liturgics-be-forgot/comment-page-1/#comment-3151 St. Jimbob of the Apokalypse Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:57:36 +0000 http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/09/06/should-auld-liturgics-be-forgot/#comment-3151 Well, sometimes a step back would be refreshing, like pitching out Schutte, Haugen, and Haas, and bringing back polyphony and chant. Well, sometimes a step back would be refreshing, like pitching out Schutte, Haugen, and Haas, and bringing back polyphony and chant.

]]> By: Maureen http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/09/06/should-auld-liturgics-be-forgot/comment-page-1/#comment-2920 Maureen Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:11:42 +0000 http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/09/06/should-auld-liturgics-be-forgot/#comment-2920 And the end of the book's missing. Bah. Well, apparently it's an Anglican tract, 'cause they never go to a Catholic church. And the end of the book’s missing. Bah. Well, apparently it’s an Anglican tract, ’cause they never go to a Catholic church.

]]> By: Maureen http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/09/06/should-auld-liturgics-be-forgot/comment-page-1/#comment-2919 Maureen Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:07:30 +0000 http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/09/06/should-auld-liturgics-be-forgot/#comment-2919 The author seems a little confused about altars in the last chapter, though. The author seems a little confused about altars in the last chapter, though.

]]> By: Maureen http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/09/06/should-auld-liturgics-be-forgot/comment-page-1/#comment-2918 Maureen Wed, 06 Sep 2006 08:59:51 +0000 http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/09/06/should-auld-liturgics-be-forgot/#comment-2918 While browsing books.google.com, I found a book that you'll probably find amusing: http://books.google.com/books?vid=OCLC49655926&id=8Gfc8DXJ0wYC&pg=PA1&lpg=PA5&dq=%22Only+a+Ghost%22&as_brr=1 Only a Ghost, by Irenaeus the Deacon, 1870. It's an anonymously written book, which shows the state of Christianity in England from a third century Christian's point of view. (A ghost third century Christian, which sorta goes against the Christian thing, one would think. But better the ghost than the inevitable loooong elaborate explanation of time travel or survival through the ages.) Apparently some people think Sabine Baring-Gould wrote it. I haven't read the whole thing, but it had some really funny bits in it. While browsing books.google.com, I found a book that you’ll probably find amusing:

http://books.google.com/books?vid=OCLC49655926&id=8Gfc8DXJ0wYC&pg=PA1&lpg=PA5&dq=%22Only+a+Ghost%22&as_brr=1
Only a Ghost, by Irenaeus the Deacon, 1870.

It’s an anonymously written book, which shows the state of Christianity in England from a third century Christian’s point of view. (A ghost third century Christian, which sorta goes against the Christian thing, one would think. But better the ghost than the inevitable loooong elaborate explanation of time travel or survival through the ages.) Apparently some people think Sabine Baring-Gould wrote it.

I haven’t read the whole thing, but it had some really funny bits in it.

]]>