<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bishop 1, Emperor 0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/</link>
	<description>Mike Aquilina&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Aquilina</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/comment-page-1/#comment-6093</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Aquilina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/#comment-6093</guid>
		<description>Ha! That would be useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! That would be useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/comment-page-1/#comment-6092</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Murdoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/#comment-6092</guid>
		<description>An Augustine fruit basket?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Augustine fruit basket?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Aquilina</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/comment-page-1/#comment-6089</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Aquilina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/#comment-6089</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll give some thought to the lineup. Jerome would certainly be good for, uh, color commentary (&quot;O thou effeminate sailor!&quot;). The problem is in the scoring. If the Fathers die, they win; but if the emperors die, they lose. I&#039;m already imagining millions in merchandise — a Valerian plush toy, a Polycarp cigarette lighter...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll give some thought to the lineup. Jerome would certainly be good for, uh, color commentary (&#8220;O thou effeminate sailor!&#8221;). The problem is in the scoring. If the Fathers die, they win; but if the emperors die, they lose. I&#8217;m already imagining millions in merchandise — a Valerian plush toy, a Polycarp cigarette lighter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/comment-page-1/#comment-6087</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Murdoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/#comment-6087</guid>
		<description>It could be an entertaining party game - who would you have playing for the fathers and who for the emperors? Either way, I think Jerome should be the commentator... Virgil would be too long-winded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be an entertaining party game &#8211; who would you have playing for the fathers and who for the emperors? Either way, I think Jerome should be the commentator&#8230; Virgil would be too long-winded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Aquilina</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/comment-page-1/#comment-6082</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Aquilina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/#comment-6082</guid>
		<description>Now that The Last Roman is behind you, I think your next project should be a &quot;fantasy football&quot; game set in late antiquity.

Or maybe you can do it in claymation, like MTV&#039;s old &quot;Celebrity Death Match.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that The Last Roman is behind you, I think your next project should be a &#8220;fantasy football&#8221; game set in late antiquity.</p>
<p>Or maybe you can do it in claymation, like MTV&#8217;s old &#8220;Celebrity Death Match.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/comment-page-1/#comment-6081</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Murdoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2006/11/21/bishop-1-emperor-0/#comment-6081</guid>
		<description>I am curious whether he would have dared try it with Valentinian I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious whether he would have dared try it with Valentinian I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
