<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hindu Traditions of St. Thomas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/</link>
	<description>Mike Aquilina's Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranjith Perimpulavil</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-1773657</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranjith Perimpulavil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/#comment-1773657</guid>
		<description>Please see the below link to know about Sani.
http://www.jyotish-remedies.com/articles/saturn_sani_remedy.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please see the below link to know about Sani.<br />
<a href="http://www.jyotish-remedies.com/articles/saturn_sani_remedy.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.jyotish-remedies.com/articles/saturn_sani_remedy.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranjith Perimpulavil</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-1772155</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranjith Perimpulavil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/#comment-1772155</guid>
		<description>The other comment is again ridiculous. &quot;In addition he is also worshipped as Sani (another Hindu deity), a misplaced reverence arising from confusion in the folk-lore because St. Thomas had told the Nair family that he had set sail from a place called “Sanai.” Sani is the Sanskrit name for Saturn. Saturn worship along with other Planet-Star worshipping is a part of Hindu belief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other comment is again ridiculous. &#8220;In addition he is also worshipped as Sani (another Hindu deity), a misplaced reverence arising from confusion in the folk-lore because St. Thomas had told the Nair family that he had set sail from a place called “Sanai.” Sani is the Sanskrit name for Saturn. Saturn worship along with other Planet-Star worshipping is a part of Hindu belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranjith Perimpulavil</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-1772154</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranjith Perimpulavil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/#comment-1772154</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oorpazhachi_Kavu

Please search the above link to know more about &#039;Thondachan&#039;. He is no more than a local Hindu deity. Some Hindu families have a custom of ancestor worship.In the above article it is said that &quot;Firstly, the evidence of their existence lies with a Hindu household who have been unwilling to put it up for public viewing or exhibition fearing attack and ridicule from some Christian radicals who had demanded their surrender to the church some 40 years ago&quot;. Actually, no Christian in Kerala will dare to seize a Temple property of Hindus. They have an experience before. see http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2005/10/nilakkal-episode-1983.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oorpazhachi_Kavu" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oorpazhachi_Kavu</a></p>
<p>Please search the above link to know more about &#8216;Thondachan&#8217;. He is no more than a local Hindu deity. Some Hindu families have a custom of ancestor worship.In the above article it is said that &#8220;Firstly, the evidence of their existence lies with a Hindu household who have been unwilling to put it up for public viewing or exhibition fearing attack and ridicule from some Christian radicals who had demanded their surrender to the church some 40 years ago&#8221;. Actually, no Christian in Kerala will dare to seize a Temple property of Hindus. They have an experience before. see <a href="http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2005/10/nilakkal-episode-1983.html" rel="nofollow">http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2005/10/nilakkal-episode-1983.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Kurien</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-1450025</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Kurien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 19:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/#comment-1450025</guid>
		<description>Since the controvercy about these coins is still rife, since we need to maintain &quot;archive&quot; on the information occassionally streaming in on the net, and mainly since we need to revert back to the topic (after Mike and Ranjith have had their say and appear to have finally retreated), I have posted (copied &amp; pasted) an article below from elsewhere on the net. I can express my only regret by asking - how is it that I, a Malayalee and a Christian cannot fathom a means to find these coins and put this entire debate to rest. Anyhow, here is the article for those who have not already read it on ccel.org.
READ ON -

&quot;A small clan of Hindu warriors received a &quot;gift of silver&quot; from the Apostle St.Thomas around 52 AD when he landed on the Malabar coast (present-day Kerala, South India). The gift constitutes four silver coins believed to be from among the thirty pieces of silver paid to Judas Iscariot by the temple priests. They have been positively identified as the Shekels of Tyre, the currency of Judea at the time of Christ. These silver relics are being held by this family in fear and confusion as they do not know which denomination of Christians the coins should be handed to.

As with all Christian relics, these coins are mired in controversy. Firstly, the evidence of their existence lies with a Hindu household who have been unwilling to put it up for public viewing or exhibition fearing attack and ridicule from some Christian radicals who had demanded their surrender to the church some 40 years ago. They were examined by expert numismatists who concluded that these were coins “manufactured” by the Jerusalem priests themselves (this does not mean they do not constitute the 30 silver pieces paid to Judas) as there did exist “Jerusalem fakes” even during the time of Jesus. Silver was being melted and minted by the silver-smiths of the temple to produce poor facsimiles of the original Shekels of Tyre, the temple tax of that time.

When the Portuguese first heard of these coins, they tried to hunt it down and persecuted many Hindu families in the 16th century during their efforts to Latinize the Nazarine Christians of Kerala . These coins were again the subject of controversy early in the 20th century when it was about to be handed over to a denomination of Christians from the USA for a price. 

Over the years, except for an occasional mention at the pulpit, the existence of these coins were quite forgotten until some journalists inadvertently spoke to an old lady of this Hindu family as part of a general interview on their customs and traditions. Paula Gruber, a German national broke the story to the media, once again raising a noisy controversy both in Germany and Kerala. Following the disclosure the family members were particularly piqued as they did not wish to be drawn into any debate over what they held sacred for so many years. It is interesting to note that they worshipped St. Thomas as “Thondachan”, but did not worship Christ or convert to Christianity. 

The deity of Thondachan represents a temple custodian and is believed to be the “grand ancestor.” The shrine of Thondachan is at the upper citadel ( called “mele kottam”). The offerings for him include, beetle leaves, areca-nut and dried rice. His idol is that of a bearded divinity with bow and arrow on his left hand and a sword in his right, weapons that the sailors in his entourage carried. His citadel serves as the site of performance for two forms of oracle dances namely “Vellattom” and &quot;Kaliyattom&quot;. The Hindu adaptation of St.Thomas worship represented him as Vaishnava and Shaiva, thus revered as Vishnu-Shiva in single form (as Guru (teacher) and Vaidya (physician)). In addition he is also worshipped as Sani (another Hindu deity), a misplaced reverence arising from confusion in the folk-lore because St. Thomas had told the Nair family that he had set sail from a place called “Sanai.” 

The term &quot;Shekels&quot; was not known to the Hindu family to whom the coins were gifted by St. Thomas. They referred to the coins as &quot;Rakta Velli&quot; or Blood-Silver and “Parindu-Velli” or “Eagle-Silver”.

Paula Gruber virtually went down on her knees begging forgiveness of this family of Kerala for having published this article many years ago in a German newspaper. 

Paula&#039;s article was about the “St. Thomas and the four silver coins” folklore that she had encountered during her travels in Kerala. For Paula it was like salvation, for she had been tracking this story ever since she heard of the four coins from her father, as a child during the Second World War years. 

Paula’s only lapse was that she had initially agreed to hear the story from the family elders and examine the sacred coins on condition that she would not speak of it again to anyone. The family in possession of the coins was not keen to have the media and the church authorities tail them if the story broke out, especially after a couple of bitter experiences with a group of local Christian youth many years ago. 

In a sense, Christianity is more an Indian religion than it is western, because the religion was practiced, preached, propagated, and accepted in India before it was embraced by us in the West. St. Thomas the Apostle was a contemporary of Jesus, and following the crucifixion he traveled to India, reaching Kerala in 52 AD. Christianity reached us in the British Isles in only about 200 AD or even later perhaps. The four silver coins are proof of this, and Paula was very much carried away by this notion. She saw no harm in publishing a small article in a German newspaper. Of course she was not to know that both she and her travel agent were going to be swamped by so many phone-calls. Matters came to a head when some inquiries from as far as the United Kingdom and the US began knocking at the Kerala family’s door.

Today, as one witnesses more instances of Hindu fundamentalist attacks on churches in India, one cannot but wonder what would become of these sacred Christian relics. While we await a miracle, we can only hope that four pieces of silver that survived 2000 years in relative safety in Hindu hands would survive for a few more years.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the controvercy about these coins is still rife, since we need to maintain &#8220;archive&#8221; on the information occassionally streaming in on the net, and mainly since we need to revert back to the topic (after Mike and Ranjith have had their say and appear to have finally retreated), I have posted (copied &amp; pasted) an article below from elsewhere on the net. I can express my only regret by asking &#8211; how is it that I, a Malayalee and a Christian cannot fathom a means to find these coins and put this entire debate to rest. Anyhow, here is the article for those who have not already read it on ccel.org.<br />
READ ON -</p>
<p>&#8220;A small clan of Hindu warriors received a &#8220;gift of silver&#8221; from the Apostle St.Thomas around 52 AD when he landed on the Malabar coast (present-day Kerala, South India). The gift constitutes four silver coins believed to be from among the thirty pieces of silver paid to Judas Iscariot by the temple priests. They have been positively identified as the Shekels of Tyre, the currency of Judea at the time of Christ. These silver relics are being held by this family in fear and confusion as they do not know which denomination of Christians the coins should be handed to.</p>
<p>As with all Christian relics, these coins are mired in controversy. Firstly, the evidence of their existence lies with a Hindu household who have been unwilling to put it up for public viewing or exhibition fearing attack and ridicule from some Christian radicals who had demanded their surrender to the church some 40 years ago. They were examined by expert numismatists who concluded that these were coins “manufactured” by the Jerusalem priests themselves (this does not mean they do not constitute the 30 silver pieces paid to Judas) as there did exist “Jerusalem fakes” even during the time of Jesus. Silver was being melted and minted by the silver-smiths of the temple to produce poor facsimiles of the original Shekels of Tyre, the temple tax of that time.</p>
<p>When the Portuguese first heard of these coins, they tried to hunt it down and persecuted many Hindu families in the 16th century during their efforts to Latinize the Nazarine Christians of Kerala . These coins were again the subject of controversy early in the 20th century when it was about to be handed over to a denomination of Christians from the USA for a price. </p>
<p>Over the years, except for an occasional mention at the pulpit, the existence of these coins were quite forgotten until some journalists inadvertently spoke to an old lady of this Hindu family as part of a general interview on their customs and traditions. Paula Gruber, a German national broke the story to the media, once again raising a noisy controversy both in Germany and Kerala. Following the disclosure the family members were particularly piqued as they did not wish to be drawn into any debate over what they held sacred for so many years. It is interesting to note that they worshipped St. Thomas as “Thondachan”, but did not worship Christ or convert to Christianity. </p>
<p>The deity of Thondachan represents a temple custodian and is believed to be the “grand ancestor.” The shrine of Thondachan is at the upper citadel ( called “mele kottam”). The offerings for him include, beetle leaves, areca-nut and dried rice. His idol is that of a bearded divinity with bow and arrow on his left hand and a sword in his right, weapons that the sailors in his entourage carried. His citadel serves as the site of performance for two forms of oracle dances namely “Vellattom” and &#8220;Kaliyattom&#8221;. The Hindu adaptation of St.Thomas worship represented him as Vaishnava and Shaiva, thus revered as Vishnu-Shiva in single form (as Guru (teacher) and Vaidya (physician)). In addition he is also worshipped as Sani (another Hindu deity), a misplaced reverence arising from confusion in the folk-lore because St. Thomas had told the Nair family that he had set sail from a place called “Sanai.” </p>
<p>The term &#8220;Shekels&#8221; was not known to the Hindu family to whom the coins were gifted by St. Thomas. They referred to the coins as &#8220;Rakta Velli&#8221; or Blood-Silver and “Parindu-Velli” or “Eagle-Silver”.</p>
<p>Paula Gruber virtually went down on her knees begging forgiveness of this family of Kerala for having published this article many years ago in a German newspaper. </p>
<p>Paula&#8217;s article was about the “St. Thomas and the four silver coins” folklore that she had encountered during her travels in Kerala. For Paula it was like salvation, for she had been tracking this story ever since she heard of the four coins from her father, as a child during the Second World War years. </p>
<p>Paula’s only lapse was that she had initially agreed to hear the story from the family elders and examine the sacred coins on condition that she would not speak of it again to anyone. The family in possession of the coins was not keen to have the media and the church authorities tail them if the story broke out, especially after a couple of bitter experiences with a group of local Christian youth many years ago. </p>
<p>In a sense, Christianity is more an Indian religion than it is western, because the religion was practiced, preached, propagated, and accepted in India before it was embraced by us in the West. St. Thomas the Apostle was a contemporary of Jesus, and following the crucifixion he traveled to India, reaching Kerala in 52 AD. Christianity reached us in the British Isles in only about 200 AD or even later perhaps. The four silver coins are proof of this, and Paula was very much carried away by this notion. She saw no harm in publishing a small article in a German newspaper. Of course she was not to know that both she and her travel agent were going to be swamped by so many phone-calls. Matters came to a head when some inquiries from as far as the United Kingdom and the US began knocking at the Kerala family’s door.</p>
<p>Today, as one witnesses more instances of Hindu fundamentalist attacks on churches in India, one cannot but wonder what would become of these sacred Christian relics. While we await a miracle, we can only hope that four pieces of silver that survived 2000 years in relative safety in Hindu hands would survive for a few more years.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Aquilina</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-1334026</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Aquilina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/#comment-1334026</guid>
		<description>Ranjith,

Thank you for the posts and for the private replies. I&#039;m sorry I suspected the email address after your initial delay.

I&#039;m assuming from these posts that you no longer believe St. Thomas&#039;s apostolate was invented by the Portuguese. I agree with you that there is good evidence of a northern journey - to northern India, Pakistan, and perhaps Afghanistan and China. But there is also a southern tradition that seems to be confirmed by the Fathers.

None of this can be proved, pro or con, but I believe there were two apostolic journeys, one via the silk road, the other by sea, via the spice route.

I am not arguing for the inerrancy of any particular document or strain of tradition. I do believe Thomas reached India and worked there and died there as a martyr. I believe this based on what I consider good historical reasons -- a multiplicity of independent witnesses, from many different ancient cultures. But I do not think it&#039;s provable in the strict sense. But very little is. The Thomas traditions and western testimonies have proven persuasive enough for many non-Christian Indian historians.

You mentioned the problem of &quot;Greek names&quot; in the Thomas material. Since many of the sources are Greek, they would naturally adapt &quot;foreign&quot; words to their own conventions. This happened all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ranjith,</p>
<p>Thank you for the posts and for the private replies. I&#8217;m sorry I suspected the email address after your initial delay.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming from these posts that you no longer believe St. Thomas&#8217;s apostolate was invented by the Portuguese. I agree with you that there is good evidence of a northern journey &#8211; to northern India, Pakistan, and perhaps Afghanistan and China. But there is also a southern tradition that seems to be confirmed by the Fathers.</p>
<p>None of this can be proved, pro or con, but I believe there were two apostolic journeys, one via the silk road, the other by sea, via the spice route.</p>
<p>I am not arguing for the inerrancy of any particular document or strain of tradition. I do believe Thomas reached India and worked there and died there as a martyr. I believe this based on what I consider good historical reasons &#8212; a multiplicity of independent witnesses, from many different ancient cultures. But I do not think it&#8217;s provable in the strict sense. But very little is. The Thomas traditions and western testimonies have proven persuasive enough for many non-Christian Indian historians.</p>
<p>You mentioned the problem of &#8220;Greek names&#8221; in the Thomas material. Since many of the sources are Greek, they would naturally adapt &#8220;foreign&#8221; words to their own conventions. This happened all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranjith221</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-1333979</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranjith221</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/#comment-1333979</guid>
		<description>http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/actsthomas.html
Please read the above link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/actsthomas.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/actsthomas.html</a><br />
Please read the above link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranjith</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-1333946</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranjith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/#comment-1333946</guid>
		<description>The book tells us that Thomas started from Jerusalem spent a few time in Syria and reached Afghanistan. Its ruler was Gondophernes. Thomas converted the ruler and his brother. Thereafter his journey was to Mazda where there he became martyr. See The Saint Thomas Christian Encyclopedia of India, Vol. 2, Trissur, 1973, p 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book tells us that Thomas started from Jerusalem spent a few time in Syria and reached Afghanistan. Its ruler was Gondophernes. Thomas converted the ruler and his brother. Thereafter his journey was to Mazda where there he became martyr. See The Saint Thomas Christian Encyclopedia of India, Vol. 2, Trissur, 1973, p 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranjith</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-1333945</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranjith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/#comment-1333945</guid>
		<description>My e-mail is ranjith221@yahoo.com. This is not a false id or address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My e-mail is <a href="mailto:ranjith221@yahoo.com">ranjith221@yahoo.com</a>. This is not a false id or address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Aquilina</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-1332219</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Aquilina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/#comment-1332219</guid>
		<description>For those of you who are interested: &quot;Ranjith&quot; has repeatedly tried to post a 3,700-word essay essentially denouncing the Portuguese for their behavior during the colonial period. The essay, while asserting that the Thomas traditions are ahistorical, addresses none of the historical testimony, beginning with the Acts of Thomas (200 A.D.) and including at least half a dozen witnesses before the Council of Nicaea (and many more afterward). I pointed out to &quot;Ranjith,&quot; via email, that he had drifted far from the argument and he wasn&#039;t taking up any of my challenges. He just continued to try posting the anti-Portuguese screed.

For the record: I did not approve Ranjith&#039;s comment because (a) it was way off topic and (b) I have no idea of the copyright status of the material, which was by another author.

I am not disputing the troubled history of colonialism and its complicated relationship with Christian missionary work. That&#039;s not our argument here. I do not dispute that Christians have sometimes been unjust to other Christians. I suspect that, on occasion, Hindus behave unjustly toward other Hindus -- and maybe even toward their Christian countrymen. Maybe.

What we&#039;re supposedly discussing here is Ranjith&#039;s assertion that the Portuguese invented the apostolic origins of Indian Christianity. I have pointed out that the earliest testimonies to the Thomas tradition date from 200 A.D. -- and they are numerous. In 200 A.D. Portugal did not exist. And Thomas of Cana had not yet arrived on the subcontinent to do his good work for the &quot;Syrian&quot; Church.

If &quot;Ranjith&quot; really wants to continue this discussion -- and I&#039;m more than happy to do so -- I ask that he please use real history in his research, think his own thoughts, and summarize the RELEVANT work of others rather than copying and pasting a brick wall of irrelevant material about a much later period in history.

And please, &quot;Ranjith,&quot; have the courage to use a genuine email address. Apparently, you&#039;re not seeing any of my private responses. It makes your charge that Christianity is built on &quot;a mountain of lies&quot; rather amusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who are interested: &#8220;Ranjith&#8221; has repeatedly tried to post a 3,700-word essay essentially denouncing the Portuguese for their behavior during the colonial period. The essay, while asserting that the Thomas traditions are ahistorical, addresses none of the historical testimony, beginning with the Acts of Thomas (200 A.D.) and including at least half a dozen witnesses before the Council of Nicaea (and many more afterward). I pointed out to &#8220;Ranjith,&#8221; via email, that he had drifted far from the argument and he wasn&#8217;t taking up any of my challenges. He just continued to try posting the anti-Portuguese screed.</p>
<p>For the record: I did not approve Ranjith&#8217;s comment because (a) it was way off topic and (b) I have no idea of the copyright status of the material, which was by another author.</p>
<p>I am not disputing the troubled history of colonialism and its complicated relationship with Christian missionary work. That&#8217;s not our argument here. I do not dispute that Christians have sometimes been unjust to other Christians. I suspect that, on occasion, Hindus behave unjustly toward other Hindus &#8212; and maybe even toward their Christian countrymen. Maybe.</p>
<p>What we&#8217;re supposedly discussing here is Ranjith&#8217;s assertion that the Portuguese invented the apostolic origins of Indian Christianity. I have pointed out that the earliest testimonies to the Thomas tradition date from 200 A.D. &#8212; and they are numerous. In 200 A.D. Portugal did not exist. And Thomas of Cana had not yet arrived on the subcontinent to do his good work for the &#8220;Syrian&#8221; Church.</p>
<p>If &#8220;Ranjith&#8221; really wants to continue this discussion &#8212; and I&#8217;m more than happy to do so &#8212; I ask that he please use real history in his research, think his own thoughts, and summarize the RELEVANT work of others rather than copying and pasting a brick wall of irrelevant material about a much later period in history.</p>
<p>And please, &#8220;Ranjith,&#8221; have the courage to use a genuine email address. Apparently, you&#8217;re not seeing any of my private responses. It makes your charge that Christianity is built on &#8220;a mountain of lies&#8221; rather amusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Aquilina</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-1332087</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Aquilina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/05/21/hindu-traditions-of-st-thomas/#comment-1332087</guid>
		<description>Ranjith,
I have not approved your subsequent postings. I explained my reasons, in some detail, in an email to you. I&#039;ll be happy to post them here. Apparently, however, you are using a false email address, because you have not seen my responses and continue to attempt to post the same comments, with complaints about my supposed censorship. Dishonesty makes dialogue impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ranjith,<br />
I have not approved your subsequent postings. I explained my reasons, in some detail, in an email to you. I&#8217;ll be happy to post them here. Apparently, however, you are using a false email address, because you have not seen my responses and continue to attempt to post the same comments, with complaints about my supposed censorship. Dishonesty makes dialogue impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

