<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bigger Canon That Can</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/06/19/the-bigger-canon-that-can/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/06/19/the-bigger-canon-that-can/</link>
	<description>Mike Aquilina&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Michuta</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/06/19/the-bigger-canon-that-can/comment-page-1/#comment-140013</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Michuta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/06/19/the-bigger-canon-that-can/#comment-140013</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%3FASIN=1581880103%26tag=wayofthefathers-20%26lcode=xm2%26cID=2025%26ccmID=165953%26location=/o/ASIN/1581880103%253FSubscriptionId=0EMV44A9A5YT1RVDGZ82&quot; title=&quot;View product details at Amazon&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why Catholic Bibles Are Bigger&lt;/a&gt; focuses mainly on how Protestants and Catholics ended up with two forms of the Old Testament. It touches on the Orthodox canon only incidentally. The book does, very briefly, treat Cyril Lucar and the Council of Jassy. It also devotes an entire section on the deliberations of Trent on the canon and shows how Trent did not exclude the possibility of a future inclusion of those book not listed in its canon. I have scans of Trent’s vote not to reject these books on my website www.HandsOnApologetics.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%3FASIN=1581880103%26tag=wayofthefathers-20%26lcode=xm2%26cID=2025%26ccmID=165953%26location=/o/ASIN/1581880103%253FSubscriptionId=0EMV44A9A5YT1RVDGZ82" title="View product details at Amazon" rel="nofollow">Why Catholic Bibles Are Bigger</a> focuses mainly on how Protestants and Catholics ended up with two forms of the Old Testament. It touches on the Orthodox canon only incidentally. The book does, very briefly, treat Cyril Lucar and the Council of Jassy. It also devotes an entire section on the deliberations of Trent on the canon and shows how Trent did not exclude the possibility of a future inclusion of those book not listed in its canon. I have scans of Trent’s vote not to reject these books on my website <a href="http://www.HandsOnApologetics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.HandsOnApologetics.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/06/19/the-bigger-canon-that-can/comment-page-1/#comment-139902</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/06/19/the-bigger-canon-that-can/#comment-139902</guid>
		<description>Does it include a discussion on why the Orthodox and Eastern Rite Catholic canon is longer than that of the Roman Catholic Church?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it include a discussion on why the Orthodox and Eastern Rite Catholic canon is longer than that of the Roman Catholic Church?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
