<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Quasten Tossed In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/08/10/a-quasten-tossed-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/08/10/a-quasten-tossed-in/</link>
	<description>Mike Aquilina&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Pearse</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/08/10/a-quasten-tossed-in/comment-page-1/#comment-218730</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pearse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2007/08/10/a-quasten-tossed-in/#comment-218730</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m about half way through.  It really isn&#039;t as good as any of volumes 1-4.  One chapter jumped about chronologically; I noticed mainly because they got to John Damascene, and then jumped back in the same chapter to the 5th century!  I also noted that the section on John Damascene rushed over his works in two pages and then spent an interminable time &#039;assessing&#039; his thought.  The latter is an exercise that will be obsolete almost as soon as printed, while details of the works and their editions and translations would always be useful.

I wish I knew Angelo di Berardino&#039;s address.  I&#039;d like to ask him to improve these rather.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m about half way through.  It really isn&#8217;t as good as any of volumes 1-4.  One chapter jumped about chronologically; I noticed mainly because they got to John Damascene, and then jumped back in the same chapter to the 5th century!  I also noted that the section on John Damascene rushed over his works in two pages and then spent an interminable time &#8216;assessing&#8217; his thought.  The latter is an exercise that will be obsolete almost as soon as printed, while details of the works and their editions and translations would always be useful.</p>
<p>I wish I knew Angelo di Berardino&#8217;s address.  I&#8217;d like to ask him to improve these rather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
