<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smut in the Ruins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/01/08/smut-in-the-ruins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/01/08/smut-in-the-ruins/</link>
	<description>Mike Aquilina&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebElf Blogroll News &#171; The WebElf Report</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/01/08/smut-in-the-ruins/comment-page-1/#comment-503980</link>
		<dc:creator>WebElf Blogroll News &#171; The WebElf Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/01/08/smut-in-the-ruins/#comment-503980</guid>
		<description>[...] ~ AQUILINA&#8211; Smut in the Ruins; Have a Mary Epiphany &#8230;. (fathersofthechurch) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ~ AQUILINA&#8211; Smut in the Ruins; Have a Mary Epiphany &#8230;. (fathersofthechurch) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Sommer</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/01/08/smut-in-the-ruins/comment-page-1/#comment-501903</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Sommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/01/08/smut-in-the-ruins/#comment-501903</guid>
		<description>MIke,

You are correct in your analysis of Roman pornography.  Everything I have seen indicates to me that pornogrpahic images (and literature) were widespread in the Roman world.  And pornography was a part of the lives of ordinary people, as well as the decadent ruling class.  The long-term detrimental effects of all this pornogrpahy have long been understated by historians.  Good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MIke,</p>
<p>You are correct in your analysis of Roman pornography.  Everything I have seen indicates to me that pornogrpahic images (and literature) were widespread in the Roman world.  And pornography was a part of the lives of ordinary people, as well as the decadent ruling class.  The long-term detrimental effects of all this pornogrpahy have long been understated by historians.  Good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
