<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History Repeats Itself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/08/14/history-repeats-itself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/08/14/history-repeats-itself/</link>
	<description>Mike Aquilina&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Pearse</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/08/14/history-repeats-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-951185</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pearse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/08/14/history-repeats-itself/#comment-951185</guid>
		<description>I wonder what it&#039;s like.  I&#039;ve long got used to G.A.Williamson&#039;s version.  But... hasn&#039;t Maier redited Eusebius to make it easier to read, by chopping out some of the verbiage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what it&#8217;s like.  I&#8217;ve long got used to G.A.Williamson&#8217;s version.  But&#8230; hasn&#8217;t Maier redited Eusebius to make it easier to read, by chopping out some of the verbiage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Sommer</title>
		<link>http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/08/14/history-repeats-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-947611</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Sommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2008/08/14/history-repeats-itself/#comment-947611</guid>
		<description>Good news, Mike.  The review makes me like it all the more. ;)  Maier&#039;s approach is to let the readers decide for themselves if Eusebius is a trustworthy historian or if he presents the material &quot;through the lens of Christian Imperialism&quot;.  Much more reasonable than the postmodernist &quot;hermeneutics of suspicion&quot;, in my humble opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news, Mike.  The review makes me like it all the more. ;)  Maier&#8217;s approach is to let the readers decide for themselves if Eusebius is a trustworthy historian or if he presents the material &#8220;through the lens of Christian Imperialism&#8221;.  Much more reasonable than the postmodernist &#8220;hermeneutics of suspicion&#8221;, in my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
