http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2009/11/17/stark-nepotism/ Mike Aquilina's Blog Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:47:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2009/11/17/stark-nepotism/comment-page-1/#comment-1720271 Paul Crawford Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:35:44 +0000 http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/?p=2192#comment-1720271 And my compliments to Mike Aquilina for drawing our attention to this book. I haven't read it, but I have read reviews, and as a historian of the crusades I can say that it looks like a wonderful, and long overdue, contribution on the subject. I can't wait to get the book itself. Thanks, Mike! And my compliments to Mike Aquilina for drawing our attention to this book. I haven’t read it, but I have read reviews, and as a historian of the crusades I can say that it looks like a wonderful, and long overdue, contribution on the subject. I can’t wait to get the book itself. Thanks, Mike!

]]> http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/2009/11/17/stark-nepotism/comment-page-1/#comment-1719424 Carl Sommer Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:42:01 +0000 http://www.fathersofthechurch.com/?p=2192#comment-1719424 My compliments to Professor Stark for writing a much-needed corrective to some of the modern writings on this subject. I have been aware for years that the Crusades were basically defensive in nature, but Stark lays it out for all to see. Very courageous, too, in the current climate. My compliments to Professor Stark for writing a much-needed corrective to some of the modern writings on this subject. I have been aware for years that the Crusades were basically defensive in nature, but Stark lays it out for all to see. Very courageous, too, in the current climate.

]]>